Assignment: Nutrition Debate

Assignment: Nutrition Debate
Assignment: Nutrition Debate
Answer the FOLLOWING QUESTIONS. You should submit a minimum of 500 – 900 words response (in totality) for the questions. Deduction will be taken for submitting incomplete answers.
1. What is a Genetically Modified Food?
2. Many people blame GMO food consumption on diseases or health conditions ie., allergies, cancer, diabetes. Please explain the reasoning for this belief. Do you agree? Why or why not?
3. Should manufacturers be required to label products containing GMO Foods? Why or Why not – please defend your answer.
4. Do you purchase organic Foods? Why or Why not?
5. Many people assume that organic foods and beverages are superior to foods produced using conventional methods. Do you feel this way? Why or Why not – defend your answer.
Anti-Diet Mentality
Anti-Diet Culture: What Is It?
It is critical to comprehend diet culture in order to comprehend anti-diet culture.
“Diet culture is a system of attitudes that emphasizes thinness, appearance, and shape over health and wellbeing,” say nutritionists at the University of California, San Diego.
It does so by restricting calories, nutrients, or food groupings, and classifying items as “good” or “bad.”
What Those Who Support It Have to Say
Diets and diet culture, according to anti-diet culture and anti-diet approach, prioritize profits over people’s health.
It shows that many professionals who promote diet culture profit off people’s reliance on their services to maintain a certain weight or body shape, despite the fact that this method is intrinsically unsustainable.
Anti-diet culture seeks to disentangle dietary restriction from health, pointing to research gaps in the area of restrictive diets and health.
It’s also linked to the fat liberation movement, which strives to remove anti-fat biases and the stigma of obesity in society by raising awareness about fat people’s experiences, particularly the barriers and unfairness they confront.
While proponents of anti-diet culture do not advocate for any nutritional philosophy, many dietitians believe it combines well with intuitive eating, which follows the same principles and allows people to reject diet culture while still equipping them with the tools to adopt a healthy mentality.
It’s also frequently related to a Health at Every Size campaign (HAES).
The next sections cover both intuitive eating and HAES.
What Those Who Oppose It Have to Say
Medical, nutrition, and fitness professionals who oppose anti-diet culture (or who still promote diet adoption after learning about the anti-diet approach) may do so for a variety of reasons:
They may believe that dieting is an effective technique to train people’s minds and bodies to learn what to consume to suit their bodies’ demands.
They may cite studies and data to back up the effectiveness of certain diets in terms of health.
They believe that being overweight or obese is harmful to one’s health by definition.
They point out that creating specific body forms or compositions is a science, and that procedures, such as diets, are the most effective approach to achieve these goals.
Eating on the Spot
What Is Intuitive Eating and How Does It Work?
The book Intuitive Eating: A Revolutionary Anti-Diet Method by registered dietitian nutritionists Evelyn Tribole and Elyse Resch popularized intuitive eating as an anti-diet approach.
It is based on the concept that humans do not need to restrict their food consumption with diets, go hungry, or consider foods to be intrinsically “bad” for them.
Instead, it promotes the idea that the best indicator of what to eat, when to eat, and how much to consume is learning about our nutritional needs and tuning into what our bodies are telling us.
It is based on the idea that in order to feel our best, we must repair our relationship with food.
In contrast to most other dietary regimens, intuitive eating lacks a “formula.”
It is built on ten key principles that attempt to help us connect with our bodies and repair our connection with food rather than discussing specific foods or food groupings.
When we don’t attribute significance to weight, the intuitive eating method frequently goes hand-in-hand with rejecting diet culture and believing that health can be obtained at any size.
What Those Who Support It Have to Say
Many nutritionists have only recently become aware of intuitive eating.
Those who support the lifestyle approach, on the other hand, claim that intuitive eating has been the natural go-to eating technique for much of human history, and that restrictive diets are the product of the diet industry and arbitrary and idealized body types.
Those who advocate intuitive eating argue that restricting one’s diet causes hunger, bodily dysregulation, and an increased urge to eat “bad” foods.
Mental and physical health can be restored by following the principles of intuitive eating.
Intuitive eaters not only have more confidence, but they also believe their hunger cues and respect their nutrition.
Eating on the spur of the moment
Intuitive eating, according to dietitians, may be practiced by and helpful to everyone, regardless of their health situation.
What Those Who Oppose It Have to Say
Intuitive eating is a radical way to meeting our nutritional demands for many people.
Some people do not believe that trusting our intuition leads to healthy eating habits, even after learning the concepts of intuitive eating.
If they believe that weight is an indicator of health, some people may be against intuitive eating if it means they will gain weight.
Others may be opposed to intuitive eating if they believe that people must educate their bodies to eat by restricting their food intake.
This might include information about the food industry’s ability to influence our thoughts.
Others may agree that intuitive eating is a beneficial technique for people who are generally healthy, but believe it is irrelevant or inapplicable to persons who have metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes or thyroid disease, because hormone and hunger signaling pathways are disrupted.
HAES (Health at Every Size) is a movement that promotes good health for people of all sizes.
What Is the HAES Movement (Health at Every Size)?
The HAES movement promotes the idea that everyone can be healthy, regardless of their size or weight.
It emphasizes that body standards, such as shape, size, and weight, are cultural, and that in the West, diet culture and those who profit from individuals spending money to obtain a specific body ideal keep them alive.
The Fat Liberation Movement and the HAES movement are inextricably linked.
What Those Who Support It Have to Say
Supporters and proponents of the movement are ardent believers in the HAES principles, which include closing gaps in healthcare access, creating an inclusive and courteous community, and assisting people of all sizes in discovering methods to take care of themselves in a way that makes sense to them.
Those who support the HAES movement believe in the principles of the movement.
These are some of them:
Respecting differences in bodily size, age, race, gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion, class, and other human characteristics.
Being sceptical of scientific and cultural beliefs about the relationship between weight and size and health.
Promoting compassionate self-care, such as finding delight in a range of movement kinds and promoting flexible eating that values pleasure and honors appetite, satiety, and hunger while also honoring the social factors that shape what is available to eat.
Many of the health metrics linked to adult body weight and size are not meaningful or founded on causation principles, according to HAES supporters.
This is true of BMI and waist circumference, which HAES proponents argue are unreliable and arbitrary indicators of health.
In other words, it emphasizes that there is little to no evidence that obesity is a cause of common health issues.
In this sense, it’s impossible to say whether someone with a larger body is ill or someone with a smaller body is healthy.
Proponents of HAES also show how harmful it can be for those with larger bodies seeking medical help when doctors believe that their weight is the cause of their health problems instead of looking at labs that truly reflect their health status (gaslighting).
What Those Who Oppose It Have to Say
Many opponents of the HAES beliefs and movement do not believe that a person’s health is defined solely by their size or body form.
They may also be opposed to HAES for the same reasons they are opposed to intuitive eating and anti-diet culture approaches, such as:
Believing that people’s bodies and minds must be conditioned to eat a certain manner by imposing limits.
Weight loss has been shown to enhance health indicators such as blood pressure, triglycerides, insulin, and even subjective assessments of health and wellbeing in studies.
External improvements that people see as a result of dietary modifications inspire or motivate them.